Schematic expectations influence mock jurors' sexual violence case fact recognition

Victims of sexual violence are often punished by the legal system when their version incident—or fact finders' perception version—violates expected schemas. We investigated influence schemas on mock jurors' ability to accurately recognize facts presented in a hypothetical case. Participants (N = 155) read vignette depicting one four scenarios: expectancy consistent, inconsistent, no detail control, or crime control condition. then indicated whether certain evidence (e.g., victim-perpetrator relationship) was presented, and if so, what correct information was. Although participants generally demonstrated accurate recognition case evidence, errors were more likely be made inconsistent with end discussion how present research can advance our understanding underlying cognitive mechanisms victim blaming practical implications for system.